User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/45.0.2454.101 Safari/537.36 QIHU 360EE
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-816.php
360 Speed Browser 0.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
360 Speed Browser WebKit Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.101closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.101closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.20602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
360 Browser WebKit Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.101closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 45.0.2454closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 45.0.2454.101closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Qihoo 360 WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
360 Extreme Explorer Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 45.0.2454.101closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 45.0.2454.93closeWindows 8.1Desktopcloseclose0.016 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:28 | by ThaDafinser