User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Nintendo WiiU) AppleWebKit/536.28 (KHTML, like Gecko) NX/3.0.3.12.6 NintendoBrowser/2.0.0.9362.JP
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/gaming/nintendo.yaml
NetFront NX 3.0 Webkit 536.28NintendoWii Ugaming:console Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
NetFront NX 3.0WebKit NintendoWiiUConsoleyes0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
NintendoBrowser 2.0.0.9362.JPcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Nintendo Browser 2.0.0.9362.closeNintendo desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NetFront WebKit Nintendo WiiNintendoWiiUconsoleyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
NetFront NX 3.0.3close NintendoWii Ucloseclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari close closecloseclosecloseclose0.05301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Netfront Browser NX 2.0.0.9362.JPNetFront 536.28 NintendoNintendo WiiUcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
NetFront NX 3.0Webkit 536.28 NintendoWii Ugaming:consolecloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Nintendo Wii U closecloseclosecloseapplianceclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close NintendoWii USmart-TVcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:28 | by ThaDafinser