User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_3; en-us; Silk/1.1.0-80) AppleWebKit/533.16 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.0 Safari/533.16 Silk-Accelerated=true
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
AmazonKindle Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Silk 1.0WebKit Android AmazonKindleEbook Readeryesyes0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Silk 1.1.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Safari 5.0closeOS X 10.6.3desktop-browsercloseclose0.20602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Silk 1.1Blink Android AmazonKindle Firetabletyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 5.0closeOS X 10.6.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Amazon Silk 1.1.0closeAndroid AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 5.0closeOS X 10.6.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.11401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Silk 1.1.0WebKit 533.16Fire OS AmazonKindlecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.58706 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Silk 1.1Webkit 533.16FireOS AmazonKindle Firetabletyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Amazon Silk Browser 1.0closeAndroid 2.3AmazonD01400Tabletyesyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:27 | by ThaDafinser