User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.3.5; ru-ru; IQ270 Firebird Build/GRJ22; LeWa_IQ270_ROM_12.12.14) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
FlyIQ270 Firebird Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 2.3Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.5GenericAndroid 2.3mobile-browseryescloseclose0.25903 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firebird Gecko Android 2.3yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.3.5closeAndroid 2.3.5FlyIQ270 Firebirdcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firebird closeAndroid 2.3.5closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firebird WebKit 533.1Android 2.3.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firebird Webkit 533.1Android 2.3.5FlyIQ270 Firebirdmobile:smartyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.04301 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:27 | by ThaDafinser