User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; en-us; CELKON A9 Dual Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 UCBrowser/9.7.5.418 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone.yml
UC Browser 9.7.5.418Android 4.2.2WebKit CelkonA9 Dualsmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.7U3 Android 4.2Mobile Phoneyesyes0.11001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2CelkonA9 Dualmobile-browseryescloseclose0.25203 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.7WebKit Android 4.2CelkonA9 Dualsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.7.5closeAndroid 4.2.2CelkonA9 Dualcloseclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.09301 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.7.5.418WebKit 533.1Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.7Webkit 533.1Android 4.2.2CelkonA9mobile:smartyescloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:24 | by ThaDafinser