User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0; ja-jp; T-01C Build/FFR002) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-3.yml
Android Browser Android 4.0WebKit ToshibaRegza T-01Csmartphone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.27803 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.0ToshibaRegza T-01Csmartphoneyes0.032 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.0closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.0closeAndroid 4.0ToshibaT-01Ccloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 533.1Android 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 533.1Android 4.0ToshibaREGZA Phone T-01Cmobile:smartyescloseclose0.048 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.027 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:24 | by ThaDafinser