User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; Motorola_ES405B_312; Windows Phone 6.5.3.5)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/smartphone-2.yml
Internet Explorer 6.0Windows Phone 6.5.3.5Trident MotorolaES405Bsmartphoneyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 6.0Trident WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 6.0closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Phone 6.5MotorolaES405Bsmartphoneyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows XPcloseWindows Phonecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 6.0closeWindows Phone 6.5closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 6.0Trident Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows Mobile 6.5MotorolaES405 Enterprise Smartphonemobile:smartyescloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 6.0closeWindows XPFeature Phoneyescloseclose0.01 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:24 | by ThaDafinser