User agent detail

Apache-HttpClient/UNAVAILABLE (java 1.4)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
woothee/woothee-testset
/testsets/misc.yaml
HTTP Library JavaUNKNOWN misc Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGeneral CrawlersBot/Crawler0.06101 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Apache-HttpClient UNAVAILABLEcloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
close closeyesApache Httpdclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Java 0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Apache-HttpClient close closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
close closeclosecloseclosecloseyesJavaCrawler0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesApache Httpdclose0.024 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
HTTP Library Javacloseclosecloseclosemiscclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:23 | by ThaDafinser