User agent detail

SonyEricssonU8iUCBrowser/8.7.1.234/50/352/UCWEB
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SonyEricssonU8iUCBrowser Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SonyEricssonU8iUCBrowser 8.7.1.234closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser Sony EricssonVivaz profeature phoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 8.7.1close SonyEricssonU8iUCBrowsercloseclosecloseclose0.028 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser close closecloseclosecloseclose0.045 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 8.7.1.234 Sony EricssonSony Ericsson U8iUCBrowsercloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 8.7Gecko Series60 Sony EricssonVivaz Promobile:smartyescloseclose0.01 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:23 | by ThaDafinser