User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; JOYPAD C82 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/27.0.1453.90 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
KingcomJOYPAD C82 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 27.0WebKit Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.023 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.29103 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 27.0WebKit Android 4.0tabletyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 27.0.1453closeAndroid 4.0.4KingcomJOYPAD C82closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.05401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 27.0.1453.90WebKit 537.36Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 27Blink Android 4.0.4JOYPAD C82tabletyescloseclose0.16102 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453.90closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.06601 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:23 | by ThaDafinser