User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows Mobile; WCE; Opera Mobi/WMD-50430; U; en) Presto/2.4.13 Version/10.00
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_ua.yaml
Opera Mobile 10.00 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto 2.2WinMobile Mobile Phoneyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 10.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera Mobile 10.00closeWindows GenericWindows Mobile (Opera)mobile-browseryescloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto Windows Mobile yes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 10.00close closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera Mobile 10.0closeWindows Mobile closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera Mobile 10.00closeWindows Mobile closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 10.0Presto 2.4.13Windows Mobile closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40804 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Mobile 10.00Presto 2.4.13Windows Mobile mobile:smartyescloseclose0.006 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 10.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera Mobile 10.00close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.018 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:23 | by ThaDafinser