User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:32.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/32.0.3 Waterfox/32.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-498.php
Waterfox 32.0Win7 6.132.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Waterfox 32.0Gecko 32.0Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.039 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 32.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 32.0.3closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.19502 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 32.0Gecko Windows 7desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 32.0.3closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 32.0.3closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 32.0.3closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.05901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 32.0.3Gecko 20100101Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Waterfox 32.0Gecko 32.0Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 32.0.3closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 32.0.3closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:22 | by ThaDafinser