User agent detail

SAGEM-myV-55/2.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.0 UP.Browser/6.2.2.6.d.3.100 (GUI) MMP/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/feature_phone.yml
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.2.6 SagemmyV-55feature phone Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.01 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAGEM-myV-55 2.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.2.6.d.3.100close SagemmyV-55mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19402 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 SagemmyV-55feature phoneyes0.014 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.2close closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.2.6.d.3.100 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41004 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 mobile:featureyescloseclose0.027 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Java Applet close SagemmyV-55Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:22 | by ThaDafinser