User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.0; WOW64; Edition Next) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera Next 12.12Windows VistaPresto 2.12.388desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.12Presto 2.12WinVista 6.0Windows DesktopDesktop0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 12.12closeWindows 6.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.22002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera Next 12.12Presto Windows Vistadesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.12closeWindows Vistaclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.12closeWindows Vista closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.12closeWindows Vista closecloseclosecloseclose0.042 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.12Presto 2.12.388Windows Windows NT 6.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40904 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Next 12.12Presto 2.12.388Windows Vistadesktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.12closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.16closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:21 | by ThaDafinser