User agent detail

Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows NT; DigExt; DTS Agent
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
IE 5.0WinNT unknownunknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 5.0Trident WinNT Windows DesktopDesktop0.012 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 5.0closeWindows desktop-browsercloseclose0.20102 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 5.0Trident Windows NTdesktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 5.0closeWindows closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 5.0closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.04601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 5.0Trident Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 5.0 Windows desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 5.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:21 | by ThaDafinser