User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 7_1_1 like MacOS X) AppleWebKit/537.51.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/7.0 Mobile/11D201 Safari/9537.53
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-539.php
yesFake SafariBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake SafariBot/Crawler0.032 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 7.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Mobile Safari 7.0closeiOS AppleiPhonemobile-browseryescloseclose0.18602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Mobile Safari 7.0WebKit iOS 7.1AppleiPhonesmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari 7.0closeiOS 7.1.1closeiPhonecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mobile Safari 7.0closeiOS 7.1.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Safari 7.0closeiPhone OS 7.1.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.10401 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari 7.0WebKit 537.51.2iOS 7.1.1AppleiPhonecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40604 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Safari Webkit 537.51.2iOS AppleiPhonemobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 7.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Mobile Safari 7.0closeiOS 7.1AppleiPhoneSmartphoneyesyescloseclose0.048 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:20 | by ThaDafinser