User agent detail

SAMSUNG M3510 UCWEB/6.0,SAMSUNG-M3510/1.0 Profile/MIDP-2.0 Configuration/CLDC-1.1 UP.Browser/6.2.3.3.c.1.102 (GUI) MMP/2.0 Untrusted/1.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungM3510 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
SAMSUNG closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Openwave Mobile Browser 6.2.3.3.c.1.102close mobile-browseryescloseclose0.20602 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 6.0 SamsungM3510smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
UP.Browser 6.2.3close SamsungM3510closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.04801 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 6.0 closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Openwave 6.2 SamsungM3510 UCWEBmobile:featureyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:20 | by ThaDafinser