User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:2.0) Gecko/20110407 Firefox/4.0.3 PaleMoon/4.0.3
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_os.yaml
Windows XP Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
PaleMoon 4.0Gecko 4.0WinXP 5.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Pale Moon 4.0.3closeWindows 5.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.18702 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Pale Moon 4.0Gecko Windows XPdesktop0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 4.0.3closeWindows XPclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Pale Moon (Firefox Variant) 4.0.3closeWindows XP closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Palemoon 4.0.3closeWindows XP closecloseclosecloseclose0.048 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Pale Moon 4.0.3Gecko 20110407Windows Windows NT 5.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.59106 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Pale Moon 4.0.3Gecko 2.0Windows XPdesktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 4.0.1closeMac OS X 10.6Desktopcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:20 | by ThaDafinser