User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (ChoX11; U; RISC OS; xx; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080224 BonEcho/2.0.0.12
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-riscos.yaml
Firefox BonEcho 2.0.0.12RISC OS Gecko 1.8.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Mozilla 1.8Gecko 1.8 Desktop0.05501 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox (BonEcho) 2.0.0.12closeRISK OS desktop-browsercloseclose0.17802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox BonEcho (2.0Gecko RISC OS yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 1.8close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Bon Echo 2.0.0close closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
BonEcho 2.0.0.12closeRISC OS closecloseclosecloseclose0.044 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mozilla 1.8.1.12Gecko 20080224a UNIX based OS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41204 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox BonEcho 2.0.0.12Gecko 1.8.1RISC OS desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:20 | by ThaDafinser