User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.4.2; ru-; K013 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/534.24 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/534.24 T5/2.0 bdbrowser_i18n/4.7.0.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Baidu Browser 4.7Android 4.4unknown AsusMeMO Pad 7Tabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Baidu Browser 4.7WebKit Android 4.4AsusMeMO Pad 7Tabletyesyes0.04801 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2AsusK013mobile-browseryescloseclose0.24302 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.4AsusMeMO Pad 7tabletyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.4.2closeAndroid 4.4.2K013closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.05 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 534.24Android 4.4.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Baidu Browser 4.7.0.4Webkit 534.24Android 4.4.2AsusMemoPad 7tabletyescloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 30closeAndroid 4.4AsusK013Tabletyesyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:20 | by ThaDafinser