User agent detail

CocoonJS/1.4 (android 4.1.2; GT-I9300 AppleWebKit/999.00 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile Safari/9999.00.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-I9300 AppleWebKit Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Safari 9999.00.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.1O2Cocoonsmartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.1.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari close SamsungGT-I9300 AppleWebKitcloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeandroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.053 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Mobile Safari WebKit 999.00Android 4.1.2SamsungGalaxy S IIIcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Webkit 999.00 closeclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:20 | by ThaDafinser