User agent detail

Evernote Android/AM_57_635.1057013 (en_DE); Android/2.3.5; HTC Desire S/10;
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCDesire S 10 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Evernote closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.3.5HTCDesire Smobile-browseryescloseclose0.26303 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.3HTCDesire Ssmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid 2.3.5HTCDesire S 10closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android HTC Desire Scloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.43304 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Android 2.3.5HTCDesire Smobile:smartyescloseclose0.09201 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.3closeAndroid 2.3Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.045 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:19 | by ThaDafinser