User agent detail

[FBAN/FB4A;FBAV/1.9.10;FBDM/{density=1.5,width=480,height=800};FBLC/de_DE;FBCR/O2 (Germany) GmbH &- Co. OHG;FBPN/com.facebook.katana;FBDV/HTC Desire SV;FBSV/4.0.4;]
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCDesire SV Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Facebook App WebKit Mobile Phoneyesyes0.041 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Facebook close HTCDesire SVmobile-browseryescloseclose0.20802 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Facebook 1.9 HTCDesire SVsmartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Facebook 1.9.0close HTCDesire SVcloseclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
HTC Desire SVcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Facebook HTCDesire SVmobile:featureyescloseclose0.017 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 11.10closeLinux armv6l Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.012 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:19 | by ThaDafinser