User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.2; BQS-4005 Build/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/42.0.2311.108 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Chrome 42.0Android 4.2unknown BQSeoulMobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 42.0Blink Android 4.2BQSeoulMobile Phoneyesyes0.018 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.108closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311.108closeAndroid 4.2.2GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.30503 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 42.0Blink Android 4.2smartphoneyes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.108closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 42.0.2311closeAndroid 4.2.2BQS-4005closeclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 42.0.2311.108WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40504 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 42Blink Android 4.2.2BQS-4005mobile:smartyescloseclose0.10701 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 42.0.2311.108closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:18 | by ThaDafinser