User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.2.1; PULID F15 Build/JOP40D) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/39.0.2171.93 Mobile Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-563.php
Chrome 39.0Android 4.2unknown PULIDF15Mobile Phoneyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 39.0Blink Android 4.2PULIDF15Mobile Phoneyesyes0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.93closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome Mobile 39.0.2171.93closeAndroid 4.2.1GenericAndroid 4.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.33003 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome Mobile 39.0Blink Android 4.2PULIDF15smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.93closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome Mobile 39.0.2171closeAndroid 4.2.1PULID F15closeclosecloseclose0.003 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.04901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 39.0.2171.93WebKit 537.36Android 4.2.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.40404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome 39Blink Android 4.2.1PULID F15mobile:smartyescloseclose0.10401 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 39.0.2171.93closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.026 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:17 | by ThaDafinser