User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; U;rv: 1.7.13) Gecko/20070322 Kazehakase/0.4.4.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-081.php
Kazehakase 0.4Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Kazehakase 0.4Gecko Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.044 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
No result found
NeutrinoApiCom
Kazehakase 0.4.4.1closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.22002 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Kazehakase 0.4Gecko GNU/Linux desktop0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Kazehakase 0.4.4closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Kazehakase 0.4.4.1closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.08901 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Kazehakase 0.4.4.1Gecko 20070322Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Kazehakase 0.4.4.1Gecko Linux desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
No result found

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:16 | by ThaDafinser