User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.0.4; AP-105 Build/IMM76D) AppleWebKit/537.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/25.0.1364.172 YaBrowser/1.0.1364.172 Safari/537.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-635.php
Yandex Browser 1.0Android 4.0unknown MitashiPlay Duo KingTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Yandex Browser 1.0WebKit Android 4.0MitashiPlay Duo KingTabletyesyes0.014 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.172closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Yandex.Browser 1.0.1364.172closeAndroid 4.0.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.28703 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Yandex Browser 1.0Blink Android 4.0yes0.009 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Yandex 1.0.1364.172closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Yandex Browser 1.0.1364closeAndroid 4.0.4AssistantAP-105closeclosecloseclose0 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
ABrowse closeAndroid 4.0.4closecloseclosecloseclose0.06601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Yandex Browser 1.0.1364.172WebKit 537.22Android 4.0.4closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Yandex Browser 1.0Webkit 537.22Android 4.0.4AP-105tabletyescloseclose0.10801 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 25.0.1364.172closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.0closeAndroid 4.0Tabletyesyescloseclose0.03 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:16 | by ThaDafinser