User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/39.0.2171.59 Safari/537.36 OPR/26.0.1656.87215
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-opera.yaml
Opera 26.0Linux Blink 537.36desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 26.0Blink Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.022 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera Next 26.0.1656.87215closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 26.0.1656.87215closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18202 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 26.0Blink GNU/Linux desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 26.0.1656.87215closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 26.0.1656closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 39.0.2171.59closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.05601 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 26.0.1656.87215WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42704 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera 26.0Blink Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 26.0.1656.87215closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 26.0.1632.0closeLinux x86_64 Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:15 | by ThaDafinser