User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0(Linux;U;Android2.2.1;Zh_cn;SAMSUNG-SGH-I997;480*800;)AppleWebKit/528.5+ (KHTML) Version/3.1.2/UCWEB7.8.0.95/139/352
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSGH-I997 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 3.1.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 3.1.2closeAndroid 2.2.1GenericAndroid 2.2mobile-browseryescloseclose0.297 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 7.8WebKit Android SamsungSGH-I997smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 3.1.2closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 7.8.0closeAndroid SamsungSGH-I997closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95closeAndroid 2.2.1closecloseclosecloseclose0.227 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 7.8.0.95WebKit 528.5Android Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.51 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 7.8Webkit 528.5Android 2.2.1SamsungSGH-I997;480*800;mobile:smartyescloseclose0.11601 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
closeLinux Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.023 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:14 | by ThaDafinser