User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 4.4.2; de-de; SAMSUNG SM-T325 Build/KOT49H) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/1.5 Chrome/28.0.1500.94
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSM-T325 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 1.5closeAndroid 4.4.2GenericAndroidmobile-browseryescloseclose0.255 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 28.0Blink Android 4.4SamsungGALAXY TabPRO 8.4" LTEtabletyes0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 28.0.1500.94closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 28.0.1500closeAndroid 4.4.2SamsungSM-T325closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.4.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.156 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 28.0.1500.94WebKit 537.36Android 4.4.2Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.455 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Samsung Internet 1.5Blink Android 4.4.2SamsungGalaxy Tab Pro 8.4tabletyescloseclose0.048 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chromium 28closeAndroid 4.4SamsungSM-T325Tabletyesyescloseclose0.08001 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:12 | by ThaDafinser