User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (OS/2; Warp 4.5; rv:10.0.12) Gecko/20130108 Firefox/10.0.12 SeaMonkey/2.7.2
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-seamonkey.yaml
SeaMonkey 2.7.2OS/2 Warp 4.5Gecko 10.0.12desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 10.0Gecko 10.0OS/2 Desktop0.029 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 10.0.12closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
SeaMonkey 2.7.2closeOS/2 desktop-browsercloseclose0.192 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SeaMonkey 2.7Gecko OS/2 desktop0.012 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
SeaMonkey 2.7.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
SeaMonkey 2.7.2close closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
SeaMonkey 2.7.2closeOS/2 closecloseclosecloseclose0.069 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Seamonkey 2.7.2Gecko 20130108OS/2 Warp closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
SeaMonkey 2.7.2Gecko 10.0.12OS/2 Warp 4.5desktopcloseclose0.008 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 10.0.12closecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:11 | by ThaDafinser