User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 2.2; fr-fr; Desire_A8181 Build/FRF91) App3leWebKit/53.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0 Mobile Safari/533.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
yesFake AndroidBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake AndroidBot/Crawler0.053 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Version 4.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid 2.2HTCDesiremobile-browseryescloseclose0.262 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 2.2HTCDesire A8181smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.0closeAndroid 2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 2.2closeAndroid 2.2HTCDesire A8181closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.154 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.0WebKit 53.1Android 2.2HTC Desire A8181closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.413 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 53.1Android 2.2HTCDesiremobile:smartyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 2.2closeAndroid 2.2HTCA8181Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.035 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:10 | by ThaDafinser