User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1703.124 Safari/537.36 MRCHROME SOC CHANNEL_profitraf6
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-498.php
Chrome 32.0Win7 6.1unknown unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 32.0Blink Win7 6.1Windows DesktopDesktop0.033 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 32.0.1703.124closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 32.0.1703.124closeWindows 6.1desktop-browsercloseclose0.2 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Amigo 32.0Blink Windows 7desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 32.0.1703.124closeWindows 7closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Mail.ru Chromium Browser 32.0.1703closeWindows 7 closeclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 32.0.1703.124closeWindows 7 closecloseclosecloseclose0.064 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 32.0.1703.124WebKit 537.36Windows Windows NT 6.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.42 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 32.0.1703.124Blink Windows 7desktopcloseclose0.012 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 32.0.1703.124closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 32.0.1700.7closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:10 | by ThaDafinser