User agent detail

LG9700/1.1 TELECA/Q7.0-1.3 MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LG9700 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Teleca-Obigo 7.0 JAVA Mobile Phoneyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
LG9700 1.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
No result found
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Obigo LG9700smartphoneyes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
close LG9700closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Teleca-Obigo close closecloseclosecloseclose0.079 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Obigo Q 7.0 closeclose0.019 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close LGLG9700Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.025 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:10 | by ThaDafinser