User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86; nl-NL) adbeat.com/policy Gecko/20100423 Ubuntu/10.04 (lucid) Firefox/3.6.3 AppleWebKit/532.4 Safari/532.4
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-618.php
yesAdbeat BotBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesAdbeat BotBot/Crawler0.016 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.6.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.6Gecko Ubuntu 10.04desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Safari closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Safari closeUbuntu 10.4closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.6.3closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.6.3WebKit 20100423Linux 10.04closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.6.3Gecko 532.4Ubuntu 10.04desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
close Desktopcloseclose0.007 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:09 | by ThaDafinser