User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; CrOS i686 1828.0.2012) AppleWebKit/535.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/19.0.1051.0 Safari/535.22
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/os-chromeos.yaml
Chrome Dev 19.0.1051.0Chrome OS Webkit 535.22desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Chrome 19.0WebKit ChromeOS Linux DesktopDesktop0.03 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 19.0.1051.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 19.0.1051.0closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.187 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 19.0WebKit Chrome OS 1828.0desktop0.008 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 19.0.1051.0closeChrome OS 19.0.1051.0closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 19.0.1051closeChrome OS 1828.0.2012closeclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 19.0.1051.0closeChrome OS 1828.0.2012closecloseclosecloseclose0.059 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 19.0.1051.0WebKit 535.22ChromeOS closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.574 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 19.0.1051.0Webkit 535.22Chrome OS desktopcloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 19.0.1051.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 19.0.1051.0closeChrome OS Desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:09 | by ThaDafinser