User agent detail

HTC_P4550 Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows CE; IEMobile 7.6)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCP4550 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IEMobile 7.6Trident 3.1WinCE HTCP4550Mobile Phoneyes0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
IEMobile 7.6closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE Mobile 7.6closeWindows HTCP4550mobile-browseryescloseclose0.185 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
IE Mobile 7.6Trident Windows CE HTCP4550 Mozillasmartphoneyes0.003 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeWindows CEclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE Mobile 7.6closeWindows CE HTCP4550closeclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
IE Mobile 7.6closeWindows CE closecloseclosecloseclose0.058 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer Mobile Windows HTCcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.407 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Mobile Internet Explorer 6.0 Windows Mobile 6.1HTCTyTN IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 6.0closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE Mobile closeWindows Mobile HTCP4550Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.019 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:09 | by ThaDafinser