User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Randomized by FreeSafeIP.com/upgrade-to-remove; compatible; MSIE 9.0; Windows NT 5.0WOW64) Chrome/18.0.1229.79
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-317.php
yesAnonymiziedBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesAnonymiziedBot/Crawler0.06901 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 9.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 18.0.1229.79closeWindows 5.0desktop-browsercloseclose0.212 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Chrome 18.0WebKit Windows 2000desktop0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows 2000closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1229closeWindows 2000 closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 9.0closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.063 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 18.0.1229.79 Windows Windows NT 5.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.404 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Chrome Dev 18.0.1229.79 Windows 2000desktopcloseclose0.015 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 9.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Safari 8.0closeFedora Desktopcloseclose0.011 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:08 | by ThaDafinser