User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; xx; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100330 Fedora/3.5.9-2.fc12 Firefox/3.5.9
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/desktop/browser-firefox.yaml
Firefox 3.5.9Fedora 12Gecko 1.9.1desktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Firefox 3.5Gecko 1.9.1Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.05 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 3.5.9closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 3.5.9closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.238 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 3.5Gecko Fedora 3.5desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 3.5.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 3.5.9closeFedora 3.5.9closeclosecloseclose0.011 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 3.5.9closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.047 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 3.5.9Gecko 20100330Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 3.5.9Gecko 1.9.1Fedora 12desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 3.5.9closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 3.5.6closeMac OS X Desktopcloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:08 | by ThaDafinser