User agent detail

Mozilla/6.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:16.0.1) Gecko/20121011 Firefox/16.0.1
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-267.php
yesFake FirefoxBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesFake FirefoxBot/Crawler0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Firefox 16.0.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Firefox 16.0.1closeWindows 6.2desktop-browsercloseclose0.191 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Firefox 16.0Gecko Windows 8desktop0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Firefox 16.0.1closeWindows 8closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Firefox 16.0.1closeWindows 8 closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Firefox 16.0.1closeWindows 8 closecloseclosecloseclose0.133 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Firefox 16.0.1Gecko 20121011Windows Windows NT 6.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.409 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Firefox 16.0.1Gecko 16.0.1Windows 8desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Firefox 16.0.1closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Firefox 16.0closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:07 | by ThaDafinser