User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux) AppleWebKit/537.32 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/18.0.1025.133 Safari/537.32 Midori/0.5
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-050.php
Midori 0.5Linux unknownunknown unknownLinux DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Midori 0.5WebKit Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.036 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Midori 0.5closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Midori 0.5closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.193 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Midori 0.5WebKit GNU/Linux desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 18.0.1025closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.005 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Midori 0.5closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.061 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Midori 0.5WebKit 537.32Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.41 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Midori 0.5Webkit 537.32Linux desktopcloseclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 18.0.1025.133closeWindows VistaDesktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:07 | by ThaDafinser