User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Tizen/1.0 like Android; en-us; AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Tizen Browser/1.0 Mobile
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
piwik/device-detector
/Tests/fixtures/unknown.yml
Tizen Browser 1.0Tizen 1.0WebKit Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.46closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Tizen Browser 1.0closeTizen desktop-browsercloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Tizen Browser 1.0WebKit Tizen 1.0yes0.007 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Tizen Browser 1.0closeTizen 1.0closeclosecloseclose0.009 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Webkit based browser WebKit 534.46Android closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Samsung Browser 1.0Webkit 534.46Tizen 1.0mobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android close TizenFeature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.014 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:06 | by ThaDafinser