User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.2.2; ru-ru; Lenovo B6000-H/JDQ39) AppleWebKit/534.30 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.2.2 Mobile Safari/534.30
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-711.php
Android 4.2Android 4.2unknown LenovoYoga 8 3GTabletyesyes Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Android 4.2WebKit Android 4.2LenovoYoga 8 3GTabletyesyes0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Webkit 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoB6000-Hmobile-browseryescloseclose0.255 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android 4.2LenovoB6000-Hsmartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Android 4.2.2closeAndroid 4.2.2LenovoB6000-Hcloseclosecloseclose0.006 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.2.2closecloseclosecloseclose0.118 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Android Browser 4.2.2WebKit 534.30Android 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.408 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Android Browser Webkit 534.30Android 4.2.2LenovoB6000 Yoga Tablet 8tabletyescloseclose0.02 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari 4.2.2closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android Webkit 4.2closeAndroid 4.2LenovoB6000-HTabletyesyescloseclose0.036 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:05 | by ThaDafinser