User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (SAMSUNG; SAMSUNG-GT-S8530-BOUYGUES/S8530AGJK2; U; Bada/1.2; de-de) AppleWebKit/533.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Dolfin/2.2 Mobile WVGA SMM-MMS/1.2.0 NexPlayer/3.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1 OPN-B
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungGT-S8530-BOUYGUES Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Dolfin 2.2WebKit Bada 1.2SamsungWave 2Mobile Phoneyes0.045 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
AppleWebKit 533.1closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Dolphin 2.2closeBada 1.2SamsungGT-S8530mobile-browseryescloseclose0.19 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
NexPlayer 3.0 Bada 1.2SamsungGT-S8530smartphoneyes0.006 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Mozilla 5.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Dolfin 2.2closeBada 1.2SamsungGT-S8530-BOUYGUEScloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Dolfin 2.2close closecloseclosecloseclose0.094 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
5.0WebKit 533.1 Samsungcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Dolfin 2.2Webkit 533.1Bada 1.2SamsungWave IImobile:smartyescloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
Dolfin Browser 2.2closeBada 1.2SamsungGT-S8530Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.044 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:05 | by ThaDafinser