User agent detail

Samsung-SCHR561 Infraware-Polaris/6.0 MMP/2.0
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
SamsungSCHR561 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
No result found
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Samsung-SCHR561 closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Polaris 6.0closeJVM SamsungSCH R561mobile-browseryescloseclose0.186 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
SamsungSCHR561smartphoneyes0.01 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
No result found
UAParser
v3.4.5
Polaris 6.0close SamsungSCHR561closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Polaris 6.0close closecloseclosecloseclose0.057 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
No result found
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Polaris 6.0 SamsungSCHR561 Infraware-Polarismobile:featureyescloseclose0.016 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
No result found
Wurfl
1.6.4
close SamsungSCH R561Feature Phoneyescloseclose0.028 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:05 | by ThaDafinser