User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.4; Trident/7.0; rv:11.0) like Gecko
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-436.php
IE 11.0Win10 6.47.0 unknownWindows DesktopDesktop Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
IE 11.0Trident 7.0Win10 6.4Windows DesktopDesktop0.021 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
MSIE 11.0closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
IE 11.0closeWindows 6.4desktop-browsercloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident Windows 10desktop0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeWindows closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
IE 11.0closeWindows 10 closeclosecloseclose0.01 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Internet Explorer 11.0closeWindows NT closecloseclosecloseclose0.068 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.406 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Internet Explorer 11.0Trident 7.0Windows 10desktopcloseclose0.005 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Internet Explorer 11.0closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
IE 11closeWindows 7Desktopcloseclose0.009 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:04 | by ThaDafinser