User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (Linux; U; Android 4.0.3; zh-CN; Lenovo A658t Build/S-2-8) AppleWebKit/534.31 (KHTML, like Gecko) UCBrowser/9.3.0.321 U3/0.8.0 Mobile Safari/534.31
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
LenovoA658t Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
UC Browser 9.3U3 Android 4.0Mobile Phoneyesyes0.08001 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Android Browser 534.31closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
UC Browser 9.3.0.321closeAndroid 4.0.3GenericAndroid 4.0mobile-browseryescloseclose0.264 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
UC Browser 9.3WebKit Android 4.0LenovoA658tsmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseyesclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
UC Browser 9.3.0closeAndroid 4.0.3LenovoA658tcloseclosecloseclose0.002 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Android Webkit Browser closeAndroid 4.0.3closecloseclosecloseclose0.141 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
UC Browser 9.3.0.321WebKit 534.31Android 4.0.3closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.402 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
UC Browser 9.3Webkit 534.31Android 4.0.3LenovoA658mobile:smartyescloseclose0.028 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Safari closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
UC Browser 9closeAndroid 4.2Smartphoneyesyescloseclose0.024 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:03 | by ThaDafinser