User agent detail

Opera/9.80 (Linux armv7l; U; xx) Presto/2.10.287 Version/12.00 SonyCEBrowser/1.0 (ModelName; CTV/PKG0.002EUA; DEU)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
whichbrowser/parser
/tests/data/television/sony.yaml
Opera Devices 3.2 Presto 2.10.287SonySmart TVtelevision Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
Opera 12.00Presto 2.12Linux Linux DesktopDesktop0.017 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Opera 9.80closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.18 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Opera 12.00Presto GNU/Linux SonyCEBrowsersmartphoneyes0.004 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Opera 12.00 SonyCEBrowser/1.0 (ModelName; CTV/PKG0.002EUA; DEU)closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Opera 12.0closeLinux SonyCEBrowsercloseclosecloseclose0.007 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Opera 12.00closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.049 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Opera 12.0Presto 2.10.287Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Opera Devices 3.2Presto 2.10.287 SonySmart TVtelevisioncloseclose0.004 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Opera 12.00closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Opera 12.11closeLinux armv7l SmartTVSmart-TVcloseclose0.013 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:02 | by ThaDafinser