User agent detail

GoogleEarth/7.1.0002.2011(Android;Android (HTC One X-endeavoru-user-4.2.2);de-DE;kml:2.2;client:Free;type:default)
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
ua-parser/uap-core
vendor/thadafinser/uap-core/tests/test_device.yaml
HTCOne X-endeavoru-user-4.2.2 Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle BotBot/Crawler0.015 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
GoogleEarth 7.1.0002.2011closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Android Browser closeAndroid HTCOne Xmobile-browseryescloseclose0.261 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
Android Browser WebKit Android HTCOne X-endeavoru-user-4smartphoneyes0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Navigator closeAndroid closecloseyesclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
closeAndroid HTCOne X-endeavoru-user-4.2.2closeclosecloseclose0.008 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
No result found
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Stock Android Browser Android HTC One Xcloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
Google Earth 7.1 Android 4.2.2HTCOne Xmobile:smartyescloseclose0.07801 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
closeclosecloseclosesmartphoneclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Android 3.6closeAndroid 3.6Feature Phoneyesyescloseclose0.07101 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:01 | by ThaDafinser