User agent detail

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; Google Page Speed Insights) Chrome/27.0.1453 Safari/537.36
GeneralDeviceBot
ProviderBrowserEngineOSBrandModelTypeIs mobileIs touchIs botNameTypeParse timeActions
Source result (test suite)
browscap/browscap
/tests/fixtures/issues/issue-081.php
yesGoogle PageSpeed InsightsBot/Crawler Detail
Providers
BrowscapPhp
6012
yesGoogle PageSpeed InsightsBot/Crawler0.013 Detail
DonatjUAParser
v0.5.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closeclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclosecloseclose0 Detail
NeutrinoApiCom
Chrome 27.0.1453closeLinux desktop-browsercloseclose0.199 Detail
PiwikDeviceDetector
3.5.2
yesGoogle PageSpeed InsightsSite Monitor0.005 Detail
SinergiBrowserDetector
6.0.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.001 Detail
UAParser
v3.4.5
Chrome 27.0.1453closeLinux closeclosecloseclose0.004 Detail
UserAgentStringCom
Chrome 27.0.1453closeLinux closecloseclosecloseclose0.104 Detail
WhatIsMyBrowserCom
Chrome 27.0.1453WebKit 537.36Linux closeclosecloseclosecloseclose0.405 Detail
WhichBrowser
2.0.10
closeyesGoogle Page Speedclose0.003 Detail
Woothee
v1.2.0
Chrome 27.0.1453closeclosecloseclosepcclosecloseclose0 Detail
Wurfl
1.6.4
Chrome 27.0.1453closeMac OS X 10.7.3Desktopcloseclose0.017 Detail

About this comparison

The primary goal of this project is simple
I wanted to know which user agent parser is the most accurate in each part - device detection, bot detection and so on...

The secondary goal is to provide a source for all user agent parsers to improve their detection based on this results.

You can also improve this further, by suggesting ideas at ThaDafinser/UserAgentParserComparison

The comparison is based on the abstraction by ThaDafinser/UserAgentParser
Comparison created 2016-02-13 13:27:00 | by ThaDafinser